Green Groove
Unite
Laughable "Douglass Report" Attempts to Debunk Global Warming
You've probably seen the Google ads lately with the claim that global warming is a myth. They all lead back to "The Douglass Report, Real Health News from Medicine's Most Notorious Myth-Buster." The self proclaimed know-it-all boasts that there is no reason to stay up at night worrying about your carbon footprint, and that "global warming flunkies" are just trying to take your money.
Green Groove would like to take a moment to warn against the good Dr. Douglass. That's right, it appears he is the one who appears to be after your money. In fact, his latest research update criticizing global warming scientists actually had this to say, "Just enter your e-mail address in the box below to get your free report. You will also get a FREE subscription to my Daily Dose, an e-letter written by yours truly that has all of the up-to-date health news and breakthrough solutions you need to look and feel great." I'm sure those solutions come real cheap.
The effects of pumping massive amounts of C02 into the atmosphere may, or may not, be hurting the planet, but think for a moment how much better life can be when living it green. Pretty soon we'll be out of oil, and have to find new (why not cleaner) modes of transportation. Soon, we'll be forced to recycle as there will be no place left to keep stacking our leftovers. Living green is just smart. It is unfortunate that we have educated doctors out there who are actually saying to stop worrying about your carbon footprint. Laughable, but still dangerous.
Peace thru superior firepower,
TERRY
Why does it matter? After all, this is a blog and the post is in the HUMOR section. Maybe in the grand scheme of things it doesn't. But if I randomly found this post via google (it's number 3 if you type Douglass Report global warming), isn't it possible (nay, likely) others will to? Especially those who want to know more about the Douglass Report and aren't sure if what he says is valid? The Internet is what many people rely on for their information. Heck, I do have access to professional databases and I came here first, would a lay person even think to find a professional journal? (Which, incidentally, would never have anything on the Douglass Report because it is so unaccepted by the scientific community... or as conspiracy theorists would tell you 'damaging to the liberal agenda') There is a lot of ignorance and mis-information out there, and even though there is a lot of evidence for global warming, most people don't understand it or are never told it. Instead they are led to believe things like the Earth is 6000 years old, or you can lose 50 lbs in a month. And when they look for our side of the story - some evidence that people who say global warming is a hoax are crackpots - all they find are insults against said crackpots, and high-minded aloofness. That's a huge turnoff. One side claims they have evidence (even if they don't), while the other side mocks them. Who would a neutral observer, who knows nothing of global warming, be more likely to believe? You might think global warming is undeniable, but that's not going to stop people from denying it anyway, or more likely, not knowing what to think. And again, this is just one post but on the other hand it's just one plastic bottle... why should I recycle it? Just like we should live responsibly on the Earth, so should we talk responsibly about it. Which - now that I've glanced at the rest of the site - many of the other posts achieve.
Also, you're old college professors are stuck in the past. Google Scholar is where it's at.
While a 2007 study by David Douglass and colleagues found that the models did not accurately predict observed changes in the tropical troposphere, [82] a 2008 paper published by a 17-member team led by Ben Santer noted errors in the Douglass study, and found instead that the models and observations were not statistically different.[83]
- I just typed up that paragraph yesterday. I kid, I kid.
So are you saying that I should not find the results of the Douglass report funny because they have since been proven to be statistically indifferent than those of (non-skeptic) scientists?
Regardless of how the actual results compare, I still find it amusing that Douglass claims "global warming flunkies" are wasting their time trying to lower their carbon footprint. That's my main beef.